The Democrat's Process

What is more important, who is elected President or the process by which they are elected? In a Democratic Republic, the process, and the integrity of that process, is way more important than the outcome.

In 2016, we had an election night that went fairly quickly, and we knew, even though some did not like it, that President Trump had won. In the days and years after that the Democrats accused, investigated, and brought into question the process by which the President was elected through the Russian collusion hoax. Their purpose was to bring into question the legitimacy of the election and to sow doubt, and, for many people, they accomplished that.

In 2020, here we are waiting. I went to bed at 3am on election night, and some of the states have not made any process since then. To me it was very odd that results were rolling in, even in pretty contested states, and winners were announced and then all at once everything came to a standstill. I am not saying there was fraud, but I can say for certainty that it brings into question the process. One thing that always makes me believe there are ballots that should not be counted, in any election, is when a party stands up and says every ballot needs to be counted, EVERY SINGLE ONE. All of us believe every single legitimate ballot needs to be counted and that goes without saying, but when a candidate feels the need to say it, we probably need to at least ask why. In several states there were many election rule changes to expand the ballot box; Pa. made some of the biggest one. President Trump has been saying for months this would cause chaos, confusion, and drag out the results. The MSM said that was a lie and there was no proof of that. This is absolutely playing out before our very eyes.

There is no doubt in my mind this election will be decided by the SCOTUS. There are laws in place on how rules of elections can be changed. In some, probably most, it requires state legislative action. For obvious reasons, one does not want rules to be changed based on the party that is in charge of the Sec. of State office or the state's election commission. If it is found that ballots came in that were part of a legal rule change, they should be counted; every single one of them. If it is found ballots came in due to changes that were made in the rules illegally, those ballots need to be disqualified and not counted; every single one of them. To me, it doesn't matter how ridiculous the rule is, it could be as ridiculous as if the ballot comes in blank then it is for the Democrat candidate, if it was done legally, it should count.

We have been electing Presidents for a long time, and one would think that with more technology this process should be getting easier, more transparent, have more integrity, and without a hint of impropriety, yet just the opposite is happening. The reason it is going in the opposite direction as it should is because things are being injected into the process to make it more confusing; a great example is uncontrolled, unchecked, and fraud susceptible mail in voting. By the way, there is only one party that are adding these things to these elections. All of us know there is technology available that could virtually remove human interaction in ballot tally.

When the process can no longer be trusted, our Democracy is at stake and the opportunity for Socialism rolls in. This is just a step in the process of transforming our nation.

With all of that said, the SCOTUS needs to do their job. I believe if fraud has been committed, and not saying there has been, the people doing it have it planned out so that it cannot be reversed. Once the SCOTUS has spoken, we will have a President, and for at least 4 years he, or his VP, will be my President.

THIS COUNTRY CAN SURVIVE ELECTING A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT; IT CANNOT SURVIVE A PROCESS OF ELECTING THEM THAT GIVES EVEN THE SLIGHTEST APPEARANCE OF LACK OF INTEGRITY!